2009年11月18日

ワーッハッハッハ>_/ ̄|◆ノ @ドレズナー vs クルーグマン(日本語記事の追記あり)

1. The root of macroeconomic imbalances is the Chinese (undervalued) peg to the dollar;
2. Obama and Geithner should be "tough" on China's dollar policy;
3. Concerns about incipient U.S. inflation are... er... inflated;
4. That goes double for long-term concerns about rising debt levels;
5. The February 2009 stimulus was too small;
6. The Republicans are blinkered;
7. The Obama administration should act in a more partisan and progressive manner.

Now, let me stress that I agree with 1, 3, and 6 at this point, and I'm agnostic on 4 and 5, so it's not like Krugman is wrong in what he's saying. It's just that he's saying the same damn thing over and over again.

オラ、ご存知の通り経済の事なんかアッパッパなんで、1〜7のどれが正しくて間違ってるかなんて判断は出来ねぇ。

┏┫ ̄皿 ̄┣┓<けんど、ラストの一文は全く同意(笑)
[以上、2009-11-17 18:06]

日本語訳、来ましたー
"クルーグマンのコラムは読まなくていい"@NewsWeek日本版
 
posted by ナナシ=ロボ at 00:06| Comment(3) | TrackBack(0) | マスコミ | このブログの読者になる | 更新情報をチェックする